Professionals do NOT use Windows
Written by Adam
Let me first state that professionals do, in fact, use Windows. That’s just a catchy title. Or rather, a controversial, flame inducing title. But people that use their computers at home and techs that repair PCs with Windows will tell you that everyone uses Windows. Very not true. Home users needing something for internet and E-mail and word processing use Windows. And sure, maybe it’s 90% of the market. But we professionals are a little different. We need something more. We have specialized tasks that Windows may not be best suited for.
My inspiration for writing this was an experience I had at Best Buy. I was looking to purchase a USB wireless network adapter for an older Macintosh still running 10.2. The gentleman helping me proceeded to tell me that everyone hates Macs and nothing is compatible with them. I laughed and shrugged and said I liked them. As we spoke more, he asked me why I liked Macs. I shrugged again and said modestly, “Well, I’m an IT guy so I use it for a lot of things and so it’s kind of technical…” He said, “Oh no, go ahead…” I explained to him all the rich features of OS X and told him some of the applications I run and how much better it is on the Mac. He wasn’t all too familiar with what I was talking about, but nodded and conceded his unfamiliarity with that stuff. Later that day, I thought more about it and I speculated what he was probably using his computer for. And of course, I came up with gaming, internet, E-mail, word processing, and some media apps.

Now you take a look at the workstations from IBM, Sun, Novell, and Apple and none of them run Windows. But let’s also take HP as an example. They sell Windows PCs from HP at Best Buy. What they don’t sell at Best Buy from HP is their workstations running Tru64, HP-UX, OpenVMS, and Linux.
Scientists, graphic designers, architects… are they committed Windows users? A lot of them are needing some serious workstations that are good for people doing CAD/CAM, GIS, high performance technical visualization and defense application.
And this isn’t just the case for workstations. In the world of servers, super computers, and mainframes Windows is not king. When people need to do serious work, they do not necessarily rely on Windows.
I’ve found the only people telling me how Windows is better are PC technicians. Ones that spend most of their time piecing together PCs and formatting them to reinstall Windows in their professional life, and most of their time gaming and downloading pirated software from torrents in their personal life. Now, once again, professionals do use Windows. But professionals disproportionately use other operating systems.
Let’s look at some numbers. I’ll start with financial figures I grabbed from Wikipedia. Microsoft’s revenue from 2007 was $51.12 billion. Let’s compare that with Sun, Apple, Novell, and IBM. Sun had revenue of $13.873 billion in fiscal year of 2007. Apple was $24.01 billion. Novell was $1.2 billion from 2005. And IBM is listed as having revenue of $98.8 billion during the 2007 to 2008 fiscal year. Now of course, this doesn’t say much about Windows verses other operating systems. These companies sell a lot more than operating systems. But I think it’s food for thought, taken with a grain of salt, when considering these competitors sell operating systems other than Windows, and they’re doing quite well.
So let’s now look at some figures for Windows usage.
How about servers? Let’s look at web servers. (I’m going to make an assumption here and not bother doing the research. I’m going to assume that most computers running Apache are not running Windows. After all, why spend all that money on Windows with IIS, just to install Apache?) Currently, about 60% of the internet is Apache and only about 30% is IIS. Well below the oft quoted 90% of average users that use Windows.
Of the top 500 super computers as of November of 2007, only 6 were running Windows. (Windows Compute Cluster Server 2003.) Linux is at the top of the list with 381 super computers using it. Redhat beats out Windows with 13. Mac OS X is even being run on 2 super computers. IBM’s AIX is running on 26 of them.
Ultimately, what I think I’m trying to get at is Microsoft with Windows does not control the world.
Stumble It! |
Submit to reddit |
Digg it! |
Mixx it! | Slashdot It!
Facebook |
Save to Del.icio.us |
Technorati Favorite It! |
E-mail this!
March 11th, 2008 at 2:15 am
Well, since you basically asked for a rant, a rant ye shall get. As a software developer, entrepreneur, and technology enthusiast I beg to differ. This is from a guy with a Windows Vista desktop, an Ubuntu desktop, a Windows XP laptop, an Ubuntu laptop, and a MacBook. I’ve written software on all three platforms and use all regularly.
The primary reason why professionals use Windows over anything else… Microsoft Office… talk about iWork or OpenOffice or AbiWord or StarOffice or anything else, nothing has the featureset, the integration, or the quality of Microsoft Office…. especially as you connect it to the backend (SBS, Exchange, AD, SharePoint, OSE, etc.). Then, of course, is the ubiquity of MS Office.
Then, take professional software. On the desktop, it’s all Windows driven. Quickbooks (only 1 SKU is available on OSX), the de facto accounting program in small business (there are 5.9 million small businesses in the US compared to those 381 Linux super computers). Search the Web for medical software, POS software, HR software, and you’ll find the majority are written for Windows. Why? The short answer is MS has a great business sales channel, their software and solutions cater towards professionals, and they have a great development community so a lot of software gets written for the Windows platform. Look at niche applications such as CAD and drafting tools… nothing in the open source community is close to SolidWorks, the de facto standard (I’ve looked long and hard, and don’t even say BRLCAD or I’ll kick something). I bet most of the components of those supercomputers, that iPhone, and those Solaris machines were designed in SolidWorks on a Windows machine.
On a more personal note, since this is a Mac blog, why do I think OS X match up for professionals? It’s not built for power users; despite the fact that it’s built on top of BSD. My main gripe, the lack of hotkey support in the OS generally, there are times you *have* to go to the mouse. Think dialog boxes, modal windows, and other UI. No tabbing through items, no underlined hotkey, etc. Heck, in Safari and Firefox for OSX you can’t tab into combo boxes in web forms! The UI guidelines are for aesthetics not efficiency. Windows still retains a critical feature for professionals, speed via keyboard input. If you look at a lot of professional software (and Windows in general), every function is accessible via the keyboard. A throwback to the terminal days where all entry was via keyboard and function keys weren’t overridden with brightness, volume, etc controls. Keyboard > mouse when it comes to speed.
Cost, businesses are concerned with cost. Windows is cheaper. What? Huh? If you’re a small business buying MS Software you can get 10 licenses of Windows Pro, Office Pro, Windows Server, SQL Server, Exchange, and everything else you’d need to run your business for just $300/year through the Microsoft Action Pack Subscription… (remember those 5.9 million small businesses in the US). Linux free? Compare the support costs for expensive IT support. OS X? Last time I checked (yesterday), Apple hardware wasn’t the cheapest on the block. And, from personal experience with a coffee incident, their support plans don’t work out so well if you’re a business.
Anywhoo… I know you were trying to get a rise. That’s my long rant. The cartoon is very true and funny. At the end of the day I like them all, I use my MacBook for professional work now… but only because of VMWare Fusion.
And, because it is a good conversation piece when I pull out the remote. I do like that it’s pretty and all the software has nice icons and funny names.